Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF FUCHSHUBER AGAINST AUSTRIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 6/94 of 4 January 1994 suspending the preferential customs duties and re-establishing the Common Customs Tariff duty on imports of small-flowered roses originating in Israel
CASE OF X AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES CASADEVALL, ZIEMELE, KOVLER, JOÄŒIENÄ–, Å IKUTA, DE GAETANO AND SICILIANOS
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2236/2003 of 23 December 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1868/94 establishing a quota system in relation to the production of potato starch
CASE OF GRADINGER v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF M.A. AND OTHERS AGAINST BULGARIA
CASE OF ORAN v. TURKEY [Extracts]PARTLY DISSENTING, PARTLY CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES SAJÓ, KELLER AND LEMMENS
CASE OF C.B. v. ROMANIA
CASE OF KAMIL UZUN v. TURKEY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF CARIĆ AGAINST CROATIA AND 1 OTHER CASE

Doc ref: 58650/12;14878/04 • ECHR ID: 001-183110

Document date: May 2, 2018

Inbound citations: 7
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Q unique documents citing • 7 citations total to v paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846