Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF BILIĆ AGAINST SERBIA AND 7 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 24923/15;2866/16;23915/15;21518/09;24291/08;30723/09;54770/15;24465/11 • ECHR ID: 001-186276

Document date: September 5, 2018

  • Inbound citations: 10
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF BILIĆ AGAINST SERBIA AND 7 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 24923/15;2866/16;23915/15;21518/09;24291/08;30723/09;54770/15;24465/11 • ECHR ID: 001-186276

Document date: September 5, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2018)302 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Eight cases against Serbia

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 September 2018 at the 1322 nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

24923/15

BILIĆ

17/10/2017

17/10/2017

2866/16+

BATIĆ AND OTHERS

17/10/2017

17/10/2017

23915/15

JANKOVIĆ

16/05/2017

16/05/2017

21518/09

JANKOVIĆ

18/11/2014

18/11/2014

24291/08

KLIKOVAC AND OTHERS

05/03/2013

05/03/2013

30723/09+

KRNDIJA AND OTHERS

27/06/2017

27/09/2017

54770/15

MAKSOVIĆ

17/10/2017

17/10/2017

24465/11

RADULOVIĆ

03/10/2017

03/10/2017

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the non-enforcement of domestic judgments rendered against socially-owned companies;

Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having noted the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;

Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the domestic judgments were enforced;

Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework the cases R. Kačapor and Others (Application No. 2269/06) and Kin- Stib and Majkić (Application No. 12312/05) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and

DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255