Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF TALPIS v. ITALYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SPANO
CASE OF NAIT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JU D GE LEMMENS
CASE OF CHAUDET AGAINST FRANCE
CASE OF McKERR AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM AND 7 OTHER CASES
CASE OF EUGENIA MICHAELIDOU DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND MICHAEL TYMVIOS AGAINST TURKEY AND 1 OTHER CASE
CASE OF RATZENBÖCK AND SEYDL v. AUSTRIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES TSOTSORIA AND GROZEV
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3119/89 of 17 October 1989 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3294/86 fixing the conversion rate to be applied in respect of levies and refunds in the rice sector
Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2161/2003 of 11 December 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF MIZZI AGAINST MALTA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF TATISHVILI AGAINST RUSSIA

Doc ref: 1509/02 • ECHR ID: 001-186830

Document date: September 20, 2018

Inbound citations: 26
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

9F unique documents citing • o2 citations total to g paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846