CASE OF HOLODENKO AGAINST LATVIA AND 6 OTHER CASES
Doc ref: 17215/07;25147/07;14920/05;6087/03;45476/04;45393/04;11065/02 • ECHR ID: 001-187382
Document date: October 17, 2018
- Inbound citations: 90
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2018)382 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Seven cases against Latvia
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 October 2018 at the 1327 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
17215/07
HOLODENKO
02/07/2013
04/11/2013
25147/07
BÄ’RZIÅ…Å
25/02/2014
25/05/2014
14920/05
DJUNDIKS
15/04/2014
13/10/2014
6087/03
GRIMAILOVS
25/06/2013
25/09/2013
45476/04
SOROKINS AND SOROKINA
28/05/2013
28/08/2013
45393/04
TIMOFEJEVI
11/12/2013
29/04/2013
11065/02
VOVRUÅ KO
11/12/2012
11/03/2013
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2018)885 );
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.