Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF DEPALLE v. FRANCEJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S BRATZA, VAJIĆ, DAV Í D TH Ó R BJÖRGVINSSON AND KALAYDJIEVA
CASE OF BUZYCHKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDSJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, GÖLCÜKLÜ, MATSCHER, PINHEIRO FARINHA, SIR VINCENT EVANS AND DUBBINK
Commission Regulation (EC) No 531/2000 of 10 March 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 as regards the premium scheme, the production quotas and the specific aid to be granted to producer groups in the raw tobacco sector
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 157/85 of 22 January 1985 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2365/84 laying down detailed rules for the application of the special measures for peas, field beans and sweet lupins
Commission Regulation (EC) No 112/97 of 22 January 1997 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1522/96 regarding the opening and providing for the administration of certain tariff quotas for imports of rice and broken rice
CASE OF SEMSI ONEN v. TURKEY
CASE OF E.O. and V.P. v. SLOVAKIA
Council Directive 69/467/EEC of 8 December 1969 on returns, to be made on the basis of regional statistics, in respect of international carriage of goods by road
CASE OF LIIVIK AGAINST ESTONIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KOROSTYLYOV AGAINST UKRAINE AND 7 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 33643/03;21380/04;23265/05;40464/05;3547/06;26581/06;55876/08;59937/08 • ECHR ID: 001-194046

Document date: June 6, 2019

Inbound citations: 40
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

UP unique documents citing • dR citations total to 8 paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846