Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF R.R. v. POLANDPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE GAETANO
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 305/96 of 19 February 1996 amending representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector
CASE OF AYÇOBAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF R.K. v. HUNGARYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK
B. v. FRANCE
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3249/83 of 16 November 1983 fixing for the 1983/84 marketing year the minimum price payable to producers, the production aid and the storage aid, together with the coefficients applicable to the minimum price and the storage aid and to the production aid for dried grapes and dried figs
CASES OF DAG ET YASAR ET KARAGÖZ AGAINST TURKEY
CASE OF G.S. v. AUSTRIA
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 144/2012 of 16 February 2012 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
CASE OF ALBERT-ENGELMANN-GESELLSCHAFT MBH v. AUSTRIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE STEINER JOINED BY JUDGE KOVLER

Document text Analytics

CASE OF ROMEIKO AND OTHERS AGAINST LITHUANIA

Doc ref: 67465/13;2784/14;13181/14;20538/14;1147/17;377/18 • ECHR ID: 001-194422

Document date: June 12, 2019

Inbound citations: 12
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

aY unique documents citing • Gs citations total to x paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846