Search
document

Document text Analytics

CASE OF GIOSAKIS AGAINST GREECE AND 7 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 42778/05;36205/06;40876/07;65911/09;80452/12;18230/09;29049/12;39726/10 • ECHR ID: 001-200055

Document date: December 11, 2019

Inbound citations: 9
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF GIOSAKIS AGAINST GREECE AND 7 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 42778/05;36205/06;40876/07;65911/09;80452/12;18230/09;29049/12;39726/10 • ECHR ID: 001-200055

Document date: December 11, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2019) 344 Execution of the judgment s of the European Court of Human Rights Eight cases against Greece

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 December 2019 at the 1 363 rd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

42778/05+

GIOSAKIS ( N o . 1 )

12/02/2009

12/05/2009

36205/06

GIOSAKIS (No . 2 )

12/02/2009

12/05/2009

40876/07

BALA

01/07/2010

01/10/2010

65911/09

SHYTI

17/10/2013

17/01/2014

80452/12

CHRISTODOULOU AND OTHERS

05/06/2014

13/10/2014

18230/09

TSITSIRIGGOS (No. 2)

05/03/2015

05/06/2015

29049/12

STERGIOPOULOS

07/12/2017

07/03/2018

39726/10

POULIOU

08/03/2018

08/06/2018

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;

Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2019)1361-rev );

Noting that the issue of violation of Article 5 , paragraph 4 , on account of the failure by the Indictment Division’s to decide "speedily" an application for release from pre-trial detention is being examined in the case of Krassas (No. 45957/11)

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant