Search
document

CASE OF POLAT AGAINST TURKEY AND 25 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 64138/11, 53319/10, 69448/10, 33513/11, 73487/12, 73954/11, 35575/12, 66575/12, 62928/12, 54093/10, ... • ECHR ID: 001-210936

Document date: June 9, 2021

Inbound citations: 17
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF POLAT AGAINST TURKEY AND 25 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 64138/11, 53319/10, 69448/10, 33513/11, 73487/12, 73954/11, 35575/12, 66575/12, 62928/12, 54093/10, ... • ECHR ID: 001-210936

Document date: June 9, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2021)109

Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Twenty-six cases against Turkey

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 June 2021 at the 1406 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

64138/11

POLAT

07/05/2019

53319/10

UÇAR

05/03/2019

69448/10

DAÄžTEKÄ°N

28/05/2019

33513/11

DAÄžTEKÄ°N

28/05/2019

73487/12

TAŞ ÇAKAR

28/05/2019

73954/11

KILINÇ

02/07/2019

35575/12

ETE

03/09/2019

66575/12

YILDIZ

03/09/2019

62928/12

ARAMAZ

01/10/2019

54093/10

ALTUN AND OTHERS

10/07/2018

47455/10

ABAY

04/02/2020

47884/10

BAYDEMÄ°R

15/01/2019

73783/11

BAKIRHAN

17/03/2020

9662/10

YURTDAŞ AND SÖYLEMEZ

19/11/2019

69604/12+

YAMAÇ

01/10/2019

74054/11

YILDIRIM

25/09/2018

54698/13

KALKAN

01/10/2019

21196/12

KALKAN

01/10/2019

63681/12

AKYÃœZ

07/05/2019

22112/12

AKTAÅž AND OTHERS

01/10/2019

27167/12

ZÃœMRÃœT

17/03/2020

30905/09

ALİ ÇETİN

20/06/2017

20/09/2017

44982/07

ONAL No. 2

02/07/2019

02/10/2019

29680/05

DÄ°LÄ°PAK

15/09/2015

02/05/2016

871/08

ÖZER No. 2

26/01/2010

26/04/2010

37721/97

ERKANLI

13/02/2003

Friendly settlement

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the authorities ’ unjustified interference with the applicants ’ right to freedom of expression due to the criminal proceedings initiated under various articles of the Criminal Code of Anti-Terrorism Law (violations of Article 10 and in some of the cases also of Article 5);

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2021)379 )

Considering that the question of individual measures was therefore resolved, given, inter alia , that the domestic proceedings have been reopened and the applicants have been acquitted or they have not asked for the reopening of the proceedings or the charges have been dropped or the proceedings became time-barred; and none of them is still detained on account of those proceedings;

Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Öner and Türk (51962/12), Altuğ Taner Akcam (27520/07), Nedim Şener (38270/11) and Artun and Guvener (75510/01) groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee ’ s evaluation of the general measures required,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and

DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant