Resolution CM/ ResDH ( 2021)96

Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

Cîrstea against Romania

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 June 2021 at the 1406 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

10626/11

CÃŽRSTEA

23/07/2019

23/07/2019

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);

Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation of Article 5, paragraph 3, of the Convention due to the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons justifying the pre-trial detention, between August and October 2010, of a suspect in a criminal case of high public interest;

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government, indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2020)752 );

Recalling also the general measures adopted in the framework of the group of cases Calmanovici v. Romania to guarantee non repetition of violations similar to the one established in the present case (see Final resolution CM/ ResDH (2014)13 );

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.