Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF ALBUL AND OTHERS AGAINST UKRAINE AND 20 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 18899/19, 49871/19, 61109/10, 29432/08, 69816/13, 16108/03, 10288/07, 52234/18, 40213/13, 18282/18, ... • ECHR ID: 001-212453

Document date: September 16, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 38
  • Cited paragraphs: 5
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF ALBUL AND OTHERS AGAINST UKRAINE AND 20 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 18899/19, 49871/19, 61109/10, 29432/08, 69816/13, 16108/03, 10288/07, 52234/18, 40213/13, 18282/18, ... • ECHR ID: 001-212453

Document date: September 16, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)200

Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

21 cases against Ukraine

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 16 September 2021

at the 1411 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

18899/19

ALBUL AND OTHERS

18/06/2020

18/06/2020

61109/10

BALAKIREV AND OTHERS

11/07/2019

11/07/2019

29432/08

BALANDINA AND ANDREYKO

20/07/2017

20/07/2017

69816/13

BEZBORODOV AND OTHERS

12/10/2017

12/10/2017

16108/03

CHUKANOV

08/12/2016

08/12/2016

10288/07

DUDYK

12/01/2017

12/01/2017

52234/18

KASYANENKO

16/07/2020

16/07/2020

40213/13

KONOROY AND GRYTA

29/03/2018

29/03/2018

18282/18

KOSTYUKOV

21/02/2019

21/02/2019

25732/05

KRIVOVA

09/11/2010

11/04/2011

11944/05

LIPISVITSKA

12/05/2011

12/05/2011

55109/08

LITVINYUK

01/03/2018

01/03/2018

17262/07

NAKONECHNYY

26/01/2012

26/01/2012

8237/06

PAVLOV

05/11/2015

05/11/2015

19019/18

RUDYY

11/04/2019

11/04/2019

9749/11

SAKHANENKO

10/12/2020

10/12/2020

2592/07

SEREBRYAKOVA AND OTHERS

20/10/2016

20/10/2016

10494/18

SHUMELNA

21/02/2019

21/02/2019

7192/04

SOKOLOV

12/01/2017

12/01/2017

4043/08

YEROKHIN

30/11/2017

30/11/2017

53967/07

ZHURAVEL AND OTHERS

20/12/2016

20/12/2016

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of excessive length of criminal/civil proceedings as well as the lack of effective remedy in this respect (violations of Articles 6, paragraph 1, and 13);

Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see DH-DD(2019)1151 and DH-DD(2021)689 );

Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved in these cases, given that the criminal/civil proceedings have been terminated; noting in that respect that the internal judgment debts were also paid to the applicant in the case of Balandina and Andreyko ;

Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined in the framework of the Merit and Svetlana Naumenko groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;

Noting also that questions related to the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions, mostly delivered against the State and State-owned or controlled entities, and to the lack of an effective remedy in this respect, raised by the Balandina and Andreyko c ase, are being examined by the Committee in the context of the supervision of the Zhovner / Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov group of cases;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases listed below as regards the individual measures and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255