CASE OF NATIG JAFAROV AGAINST AZERBAIJAN
Doc ref: 64581/16 • ECHR ID: 001-212428
Document date: September 16, 2021
- 0 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)204
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Natig Jafarov against Azerbaijan (Mammadli group)
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 16 September 2021
at the 1411 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
64581/16
NATIG JAFAROV
07/11/2019
07/02/2020
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this and to the violations established mainly on account of his arrest and detention in the absence of any reasonable suspicion that he had committed an offence (violations of Article 5 § 1(c)), the lack of a genuine review of the lawfulness of their detention (violations of Article 5 § 4), and of the Court’s findings that the actual purpose of the criminal proceedings was to punish him for his active political engagement and to prevent him from participating as a representative of the opposition in the referendum campaign and that the restriction of his rights was applied for purposes other than those prescribed by the Convention (violations of Article 18 taken in conjunction with Article 5);
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the information provided by the government in respect of the individual measures including as regards the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;
Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved, given that the criminal proceedings against him were terminated and that therefore no negative consequences persist for him on account of the abusive criminal charges brought in the framework of the proceedings examined by the European Court;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the Mammadli group (Application No. 47145/14) of cases and that the closure of this case therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation to the problem of misuse of the criminal law against government critics, civil society activists and human rights defenders and to the need to eradicate this problem and to ensure the independence of the judiciary and the prosecuting authorities;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and
DECIDES to close the examination of this case.