Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SLIVENKO v. LATVIASEPARATE DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARUSTE
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 291/92 of 6 February 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1730/87 laying down quality standards for table grapes
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 April 2013. Anton Las v PSA Antwerp NV.
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 April 2000. Kjell Karlsson and Others.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2426/86 of 29 July 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 771/74 laying down detailed rules for granting aid for flax and hemp
Regulation (EEC) No 6/73 of the Commission of 2 January 1973 fixing the average producer prices for wine
CASE OF SKÄRBY v. SWEDENDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RYSSDAL
Council Regulation (EEC) No 458/80 of 18 February 1980 on collective projects for the restructuring of vineyards
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 June 2010. Criminal proceedings against E and F.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021. RFA International, LP v European Commission.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 April 2008. Peek & Cloppenburg KG v Cassina SpA.

C-456/06 • 62006CJ0456 • ECLI:EU:C:2008:232

Inbound citations: 24
•
Cited paragraphs: 8
•
Outbound citations: 12

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

06 unique documents citing • p7 citations total to b paragraphs

Outbound citations

E unique documents cited • 27 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846