Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

Stefanelli v. San Marino

Doc ref: 35396/97 • ECHR ID: 002-6079

Document date: February 8, 2000

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

Stefanelli v. San Marino

Doc ref: 35396/97 • ECHR ID: 002-6079

Document date: February 8, 2000

Cited paragraphs only

Information Note on the Court’s case-law 15

February 2000

Stefanelli v. San Marino - 35396/97

Judgment 8.2.2000 [Section II]

Article 6

Criminal proceedings

Article 6-1

Public hearing

Oral hearing

Lack of oral hearing before the trial judge: violation

Facts : The applicant was questioned and detained in connection with proceedings relating to the unlawful marketing of products. The investigation was entrusted t o a commissioner. The witnesses were examined and the defence pleadings filed. The commissioner held public hearings for examining witnesses. Having neither held a public hearing nor seen the applicant, the first instance judge sentenced her to four years and six months’ imprisonment and ordered a protective measure of supervision because she was considered dangerous. The applicant lodged an appeal against this decision. The same commissioner handled the case for the investigation on appeal. The appeal judg e upheld the applicant’s conviction; reduced the sentence to three years and lifted the preventive measure of supervision.

Law : Article 6 § 1: According to the Government; hearings dedicated to the examination of witnesses had been held at first instance a nd were subject to appeal had the applicant wished to lodge one. However, at first instance these hearings had been held before the commissioner, who had only investigative duties. The same had apparently occurred on appeal. As a result, the proceedings ha d taken place without a hearing at first instance and on appeal before the judicial officer called upon to take a decision on the merits.

Conclusion : violation (unanimous)

Article 41: The Court found that the applicant had undoubtedly suffered non-pecuniary damage and awarded her the sum of 10,000,000 Italian lire (ITL). In respect of costs and expenses, the Court awarded her ITL 9,000,000. (The applicant’s claim was express ed in euros.)

© Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.

Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846