Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF LORENZO BRAGADO AND OTHERS v. SPAINCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE ELÃ“SEGUI
Pavlov et autres c. Russie
CASE OF YEZHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV
Commission Regulation (EC) No 507/2002 of 21 March 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 2331/97 on special conditions for granting export refunds on certain pigmeat products
CASE OF LÜDI v. SWITZERLANDPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MATSCHER
Farbtuhs v. Latvia
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2237/77 of 23 September 1977 amending Regulation No 118/66/EEC on the form of farm return to be used for the purpose of determining incomes of agricultural holdings
CASE OF H. AGAINST BELGIUM
Commission Regulation (EC) No 119/2006 of 24 January 2006 fixing the definitive rate of refund and the percentage of system B export licences to be issued in the fruit and vegetables sector (tomatoes, oranges, lemons, table grapes and apples)
CASE OF KHURAL AND ZEYNALOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)

Document text Analytics

Ecer and Zeyrek v. Turkey

Doc ref: 29295/95;29363/95 • ECHR ID: 002-5789

Document date: February 27, 2001

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 1

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

3 unique documents cited • K citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846