Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

Demir and Baykara v. Turkey (dec.)

Doc ref: 34503/97 • ECHR ID: 002-4226

Document date: September 23, 2004

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

Demir and Baykara v. Turkey (dec.)

Doc ref: 34503/97 • ECHR ID: 002-4226

Document date: September 23, 2004

Cited paragraphs only

Information Note on the Court’s case-law 67

August-September 2004

Demir and Baykara v. Turkey (dec.) - 34503/97

Decision 23.9.2004 [Section III]

Article 11

Article 11-1

Freedom of association

Refusal to recognise trade union formed by local authority employees on account of their status as civil servants: admissible

The applicants are a member and chairperson, respectively, of the trade union Tüm Bel-Sen, set up in 1990 by municipal employees. The trade union had concluded a collective agreement on working conditions with a municipality. As the municipality had not met its obligations under the agreement, the first applicant, acting as the trade union’s repres entative, brought proceedings in 1993. The decision of the first-instance court having been favourable to the trade union, the municipality appealed to the Court of Cassation. The latter overturned the judgment, and the case was sent back to the first-inst ance court, which again ruled in favour of the trade union. The Court of Cassation quashed the judgment. It held that the trade union to which the applicants belonged did not have legal personality and that it was accordingly not empowered to conclude a co llective agreement, since the law did not expressly authorise State employees to establish trade unions. These events occurred in the period 1972-1997, during which time the legislation was silent on whether state employees could establish trade unions. Be fore the date of the impugned acts, the law provided that state employees were authorised to set up trade unions. A text had repealed this provision in 1972. Authorisation was renewed in 1997.

Admissible under Article 14, taken together with Article 11.

© Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.

Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846