Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

Český v. the Czech Republic

Doc ref: 33644/96 • ECHR ID: 002-7038

Document date: June 6, 2000

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

Český v. the Czech Republic

Doc ref: 33644/96 • ECHR ID: 002-7038

Document date: June 6, 2000

Cited paragraphs only

Information Note on the Court’s case-law 19

June 2000

Český v. the Czech Republic - 33644/96

Judgment 6.6.2000 [Section III]

Article 5

Article 5-3

Length of pre-trial detention

Length of detention on remand: violation

Facts : The case concerns the length of the applicant’s detention on remand. He was arrested in Italy in February 1991, having been released on probation after serving part of a prison sentence in the Czech Republic. His detention on remand was prolonged several times and numerous requests for release were unsuccessful. He was convicted on five occasions, but each time the conviction was quashed. An appeal is pending.

Law : Article 5 § 3 - The perio ds of detention on remand to be examined total 3 years, 3 months and 7 days. There was reasonable suspicion of an offence and the reasons given by the domestic courts concerning the risk of absconding were sufficient and relevant, making it unnecessary to examine the other grounds invoked. However, in view of various delays, special diligence was not displayed in the conduct of the proceedings.

Conclusion : violation (unanimously).

Article 41 - As an appeal is pending, it cannot be said that the length of th e detention on remand has been deducted from the sentence. Even assuming the applicant did not have permanent employment at the time of his arrest, there is a certain causal link between the violation and the sums he claims in respect of loss of earnings. The Court therefore awarded him 100,000 CZK in that respect. It considered that the finding of a violation constituted just satisfaction in respect of non-pecuniary damage. Finally, it made an award in respect of costs.

© Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.

Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846