Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

Rajak v. Croatia

Doc ref: 49706/99 • ECHR ID: 002-5687

Document date: June 28, 2001

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

Rajak v. Croatia

Doc ref: 49706/99 • ECHR ID: 002-5687

Document date: June 28, 2001

Cited paragraphs only

Information Note on the Court’s case-law 31

June 2001

Rajak v. Croatia - 49706/99

Judgment 28.6.2001 [Section IV]

Article 35

Article 35-1

Exhaustion of domestic remedies

Effective domestic remedy

Effectiveness of complaint under Section 59 § 4 of the Constitutional Court Act as a remedy in respect of the length of proceedings

The case concerns the length of civil proceedings instituted by the applicant in June 19 75 and still pending at first instance. (The Convention entered into force in respect of Croatia in 1997.)

Law : Government's preliminary objection (non-exhaustion) – Even assuming a request under Section 59 § 4 of the Constitutional Court Act is an effecti ve remedy in respect of complaints about the length of court proceedings, the effectiveness of such a remedy may depend on whether it has a significant effect on the length of the proceedings as a whole. The provision entered into force in September 1999, by which time the proceedings had already lasted some 24 years, out of which one year, ten months and 19 days fall within the Court’s jurisdiction. Even if the applicant had filed a request under Section 59 § 4, any decision which might have speeded up the proceedings could not have made up for any delays which had already occurred. Accordingly, in the circumstances of the case, such a request cannot be considered an effective remedy and the preliminary objection must be dismissed.

Article 6 § 1 – The reaso nable time requirement has not been met.

Conclusion : violation (unanimously).

Article 41 – The Court made awards in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses.

© Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.

Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255