Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF VERMEIRE v. BELGIUMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARTENS
CASE OF SAVERIADES v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KARAKA Åž
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1890/90 of 4 July 1990 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1422/76 of 21 June 1976 laying down rules for determining rice marketing centres other than Arles and Vercelli
CASE OF WIZERKANIUK v. POLANDJOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES GARLICKI AND VUČINIĆ
Council Regulation (EC) No 2112/2005 of 21 November 2005 on access to Community external assistance
CASE OF CAIRNEY AND SIXTEEN OTHERS CASES AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
Règlement (CEE) n 41/69 de la Commission, du 9 janvier 1969, portant fixation des restitutions pour le riz et les brisures
Regulation (EEC) No 750/68 of the Council of 18 June 1968 laying down general rules for offsetting storage costs for sugar
CASE OF V v. THE CZECH REPUBLICPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ELÃ“SEGUI

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of 13 September 2001. Schieving-Nijstad vof and Others v Robert Groeneveld.

C-89/99 • 61999CJ0089 • ECLI:EU:C:2001:438

Inbound citations: 9
•
Cited paragraphs: 5
•
Outbound citations: 4

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

A unique documents citing • 7 citations total to 1 paragraphs

Outbound citations

p unique documents cited • l citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846