Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KJARTAN ÁSMUNDSSON v. ICELANDCONCURR ING OPINION OF JUDGE THOMASSEN
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 280/81 of 30 January 1981 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2420/79 suspending imports of frozen squid
CASE OF AUGUSTO v. FRANCECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SPIELMANN
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 October 2011. European Commission v Italian Republic.
Judgment of the Court of 23 March 1982. D.M. Levin v Staatssecretaris van Justitie.
CASE OF MKHITARYAN v. ARMENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE FURA-SANDSTRÖM
CASE OF HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOMSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ZEKIA
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2025. Ryanair DAC v European Commission.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3109/88 of 7 October 1988 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2819/79 as regards certain textile products (category 65) originating in Turkey
94/989/EC: Commission Decision of 21 December 1994 amending Decision 93/495/EEC laying down specific conditions for importing fishery products from Canada

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 23 September 2009.

Phildar SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

T-99/06 • 62006TJ0099 • ECLI:EU:T:2009:346

Inbound citations: 7
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 4

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

i unique documents citing • 8 citations total to 4 paragraphs

Outbound citations

R unique documents cited • 9 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846