Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 69/96 of 18 January 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2676/90 determining Community methods for the analysis of wines
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 46/95 of 12 January 1995 fixing the export refunds on milk and milk products
CASE OF LAKIĆEVIĆ AND OTHER CASES AGAINST MONTENEGRO AND SERBIA
Regulation (EEC) No 190/68 of the Commission of 16 February 1968 on the denaturing process for colza and rape seed
CASE OF PALADI v. MOLDOVAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR NICOLAS BRATZA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 851/2000 of 27 April 2000 laying down the marketing standard for apricots
CASE OF RUSSIAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF ENTREPRENEURS AGAINST RUSSIA AND 1 OTHER CASE
CASE OF EGMEZ v. CYPRUSPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LOIZOU
CASE OF MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES ROZAKIS AND VAJIĆ
CASE OF TARABURCA AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 2 OTHER CASES

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 16 February 2012. T.G. van Laarhoven v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.

C-594/10 • 62010CJ0594 • ECLI:EU:C:2012:92

Inbound citations: 5
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 22

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

j unique documents citing • x citations total to a paragraphs

Outbound citations

uT unique documents cited • rR citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846