Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ALBUL AND OTHERS AGAINST UKRAINE AND 20 OTHER CASES
CASE OF STĘPIEŃ v. POLANDPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HIRVELÄ
CORRIGENDUM TO:# Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 2892/77 of 19 December 1977 implementing in respect of own resources accruing from value added tax the Decision of 21 April 1970 on the replacement of financial contributions from Member States by the Communities' own resources
CASE OF OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. UKRAINECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE YUDKIVSKA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2729/2000 of 14 December 2000 laying down detailed implementing rules on controls in the wine sector
CASE OF BARGAO AND DOMINGOS CORREIA v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF BAGHDASARYAN AND ZARIKYANTS v. ARMENIA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 169/88 of 21 January 1988 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
CASE OF TEŠIĆ v. SERBIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3688/90 of 19 December 1990 on applications for production aid for dried grapes

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 February 2023. ASA v DGRFP Cluj.

C-519/21 • 62021CJ0519 • ECLI:EU:C:2023:106

Inbound citations: 7
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 40

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

t unique documents citing • M6 citations total to h paragraphs

Outbound citations

tK unique documents cited • 6h citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846