Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF JAKUB AND 109 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
CASE OF KAYA v. GERMANYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE ROZAKIS
CASE OF R.C. v. SWEDENDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FURA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1266/2003 of 16 July 2003 fixing the export refunds on olive oil
CASE OF SAÇILIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEYJOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES POPOVIĆ AND SAJÓ
CASE OF JESTCOV AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
M.A. FAYED, A. FAYED AND S. FAYED v. the UNITED KINGDOMCONCURRING OPINION OF MRS. J. LIDDY
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 74/88 of 12 January 1988 altering the import levies on products processed from cereals and rice
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 99/87 of 14 January 1987 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
CASE OF OGRAZDEN AD AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.

WV v European External Action Service (EEAS).

C-171/20 P • 62020CJ0171 • ECLI:EU:C:2022:154

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 16

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

r unique documents citing • 4 citations total to l paragraphs

Outbound citations

Xq unique documents cited • 7A citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846