Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

STODOLSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND

Doc ref: 41142/17;66842/17;14258/18 • ECHR ID: 001-221672

Document date: November 10, 2022

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

STODOLSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND

Doc ref: 41142/17;66842/17;14258/18 • ECHR ID: 001-221672

Document date: November 10, 2022

Cited paragraphs only

FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 41142/17 Tomasz STODOLSKI against Poland and 2 other applications

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 10 November 2022 as a Committee composed of:

Ivana Jelić , President , Krzysztof Wojtyczek, Erik Wennerström , judges ,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of the applicants and their representatives is set out in the appendix.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated to the Polish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

On 16 June 2021 the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on various dates in 2020 and 2021 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. However, no response has followed.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications.

Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 1 December 2022.

Viktoriya Maradudina Ivana Jelić Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Case name

Lodged on

Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality

Represented by

1.

41142/17

Stodolski v. Poland

30/05/2017

Tomasz STODOLSKI 1976 Gdańsk Polish

Marcin LIPSKI

2.

66842/17

Potraski v. Poland

25/09/2017

Robert POTRASKI 1981 Żytkowice Polish

3.

14258/18

MÅ‚ynarski v. Poland

16/03/2018

Włodzimierz MŁYNARSKI 1950 Słubice Polish

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255