Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SAKHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 19264/13;37260/13;50115/13;3430/14;9733/14;10205/14;11907/14;12927/14;44802/14;58163/14;2329/15 • ECHR ID: 001-222020

Document date: November 24, 2022

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 3

SAKHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 19264/13;37260/13;50115/13;3430/14;9733/14;10205/14;11907/14;12927/14;44802/14;58163/14;2329/15 • ECHR ID: 001-222020

Document date: November 24, 2022

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 19264/13 Dmitriy Borisovich SAKHAROV and Sergey Vladimirovich SOROKIN against Russia and 10 other applications

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 24 November 2022 as a Committee composed of:

Darian Pavli , President , Ioannis Ktistakis, Andreas Zünd , judges ,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.

The applicants were represented by Mr E. Mezak, a human rights defender from Syktyvkar.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 11 of the Convention concerning the restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention (see the appended table).

On 20 March 2014 Mr A. Ostrovskiy, the second applicant in application no. 37260/13, died. By letter of 14 January 2015 his daughter Ms E. Ostrovskaya expressed her interest to pursue the proceedings before the Court in his stead. The Government did not comment on this matter.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The applicants complained about the restrictions imposed by the authorities on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events and the absence of an effective domestic remedy in that regard. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Articles 11 and 13 of the Convention.

The Court does not consider it necessary to address the question as to the locus standi of Ms E. Ostrovskaya in the proceedings before it because the applications are in any event inadmissible for the following reasons.

The Court observes that the applicants challenged the decisions of the Syktyvkar City Administration refusing to approve the locations of their public events in the domestic courts after the planned dates of their public events. The Court has already found in Alekseyev v. Russia (nos. 4916/07 and 2 others, § 99, 21 October 2010) that the judicial remedy of a post-hoc character the applicants had recourse to was incapable of providing adequate redress in respect of the alleged violations of Article 11 of the Convention. It subsequently found a violation of Article 13 of the Convention owing to the absence of an effective domestic remedy (ibid., § 100). The applicants therefore should have been aware of the ineffectiveness of the judicial review as a remedy in respect of their complaints so as to reasonably anticipate the application of the six-month requirement in their case (see, for similar approach, Alekseyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 14988/09 and 50 others, §§ 14-16, 27 November 2018). Accordingly, they should have lodged their complaints within six months of the date of the Syktyvkar City Administration’s decisions refusing to approve the locations of their public events (see Komarova v. Russia (dec.) [Committee], no. 44570/11, § 18, 26 May 2020).

It follows that the applications are inadmissible for non-compliance with the six-month rule and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the applications inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 15 December 2022.

Viktoriya Maradudina Darian Pavli Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(Restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Location

Date of the public event planned

Restrictions applied

Decision by local authority

Name of local authority

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Final domestic decision

(type of procedure)

Date

Name of the court

19264/13

09/02/2013

Dmitriy Borisovich SAKHAROV

1961Sergey Vladimirovich SOROKIN

1958Stefanovskaya square Syktyvkar

04/02/2012

Proposal to change the location, general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (near the court buildings)

Syktyvkar City Administration

20/01/2012

Notification procedure:

07/03/2013

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

37260/13

07/05/2013

(8 applicants)

Vladimir Vladimirovich ZUBKOV

1974Aleksandr Borisovich OSTROVSKIY

1964Deceased in 2014

Aleksandr Fedorovich SHCHIGOLEV

1961Igor Valentinovich SAZHIN

1963Leonid Aleksandrovich ZILBERG

1962Vera Petrovna TERESHONKOVA

1958Anastasiya Sergeyevna GRUMAND

1993Anton Aleksandrovich PAKHOMOV

1990Teatralnaya Square

Syktyvkar

10/12/2011

Proposal to change the location

Syktyvkar City Administration

08/12/2011

Notification procedure:

08/11/2012

Supreme Court of Komi Republic

50115/13

17/06/2013

Dmitriy Borisovich SAKHAROV

1961Sergey Vladimirovich SOROKIN

1958Teatralnaya Square

Syktyvkar

04/02/2012

Proposal to change the location

Syktyvkar City Administration

26/01/2012

Notification procedure:

17/12/2012

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

3430/14

17/12/2013

Darya Vladimirovna CHERNYSHEVA

1991Vyacheslav Sergeyevich SLYUSARYEV

1986Lenina street

Syktyvkar

31/03/2013

Proposal to change the location, general prohibition to hold LGBT event in view of the negative reaction of the society

Syktyvkar City Administration

25/03/2013

Notification procedure:

17/03/2013

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

9733/14

14/01/2014

Olga Aleksandrovna KRUGLOVA

1984Aleksandr Aleksandrovich NITCHENKO

1984Syktyvkar Several manifestations planned between

14/09/2012 and 18/09/2012;

21/09/2012 and 25/09/2012;

28/09/2012 and 02/10/2012;

05/10/2012 and 12/10/2012;

13/10/2012 and 16/10/2012

Proposals to change the locations

Syktyvkar City Administration

05/09/2012;

12/09/2012;

20/09/2012;

27/09/2012;

04/10/2012;

05/10/2012

Art. 13 – lack of an effective remedy in domestic law in relation to Article 11 complaint

Notification procedure:

15/07/2013

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

10205/14

21/01/2014

(3 applicants)

Igor Valentinovich SAZHIN

1963Semen Alekseyevich TERESHONKOV

1982Marina Sergeyevna SEDOVA

1988Stefanovskaya Square

Syktyvkar

17/06/2013

Proposal to change the location

Syktyvkar City Administration

11/06/2013

Notification procedure:

16/12/2013

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

11907/14

27/01/2014

(3 applicants)

Natalya Alekseyevna BOYARINTSEVA

1975Olga Aleksandrovna KRUGLOVA

1984Alena Aleksandrovna GALINSKAYA

1982Stefanovskaya Square

Syktyvkar

24/06/2013

Proposal to change the location; general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (near the court buildings)

Syktyvkar City Administration

18/06/2013

Art. 13 – lack of an effective remedy in domestic law in relation to Article 11 complaint

Notification procedure:

16/12/2013

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

12927/14

28/01/2014

(4 applicants)

Tatyana Andreyevna KOROBOVSKAYA

1984Dmitriy Sergeyevich PATOV

1986Viktor Yevgenyevich DUDIN

1957Pavel Vladimirovich LOGOVSKIY

1982Stefanovskaya Square

Syktyvkar

20/06/2013;

21/06/2013;

23/06/2013.

Proposals to change the locations; general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (near the court buildings)

Syktyvkar City Administration

18/06/2013

Notification procedure:

26/12/2013

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

44802/14

28/05/2014

Svetlana Vladimirovna UVARKINA

1975Marina Sergeyevna SEDOVA

1988Square in front of the Prosecutor’s Office

Syktyvkar

04/06/2013

Proposal to change the location

Syktyvkar City Administration

30/05/2013

Notification procedure:

28/11/2013

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

58163/14

16/07/2014

(4 applicants)

Aleksandr Valeryevich ZHIVOTKO

1973Olga Aleksandrovna KRUGLOVA

1984Yuliya Borisovna PLOTNIKOVA

1981Elvira Viktorovna BEREZA

1986Stefanovskaya Square

Syktyvkar

05/07/2013;

10/07/2013

Proposals to change the locations; general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (near the court buildings)

Syktyvkar City Administration

01/07/2013

Notification procedure:

16/01/2014

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

2329/15

08/05/2013

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich NITCHENKO

1984Several locations

Syktyvkar

12/05/2012;

22/05/2012;

03/06/2012;

08/06/2012;

09/06/2012.

Proposals to change the locations

Syktyvkar City Administration

28/04/2012;

11/05/2012;

22/05/2012;

01/06/2012;

30/05/2012.

Notification procedure: 16/01/2013

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

23/08/2012

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic (public event of 09/06/2012)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255