Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ARMONIENE v. LITHUANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ZAGREBELSKY
CASE OF NAGY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
CASE OF AĞAOĞLU AGAINST TURKEY AND 1 OTHER CASE
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 of 18 September 2012 setting out the provisions necessary for the implementation of the renewal procedure for active substances, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market Text with EEA relevance
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1869/2005 of 16 November 2005 replacing the Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
CASE OF İNAN v. TURKEY
Commission Regulation (EU) No 20/2010 of 12 January 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Arzùa-Ulloa (PDO)]
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1110/97 of 18 June 1997 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3061/84 laying down detailed rules for the application of the system of production aid for olive oil
CASE OF MAÇİN v. TURKEY (No. 2)
CASE OF KOPPI v. AUSTRIA

Document text Analytics

GRAF v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 1753/63 • ECHR ID: 001-166782

Document date: June 1, 1965

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

9 unique documents citing • z citations total to w paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846