Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

PUGIN v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 3121/18 • ECHR ID: 001-214162

Document date: November 10, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 1
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

PUGIN v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 3121/18 • ECHR ID: 001-214162

Document date: November 10, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 3121/18 Ivan Alekseyevich PUGIN

against Russia

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 10 November 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Peeter Roosma, President, Dmitry Dedov, Andreas Zünd, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 5 December 2017,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant, Mr Ivan Alekseyevich Pugin, was born in 1988.

The applicant was represented by Mr Y. Kulakov, a lawyer practising in Arkhangelsk.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning lack of impartiality of courts which had considered his administrative case in view of the absence of the prosecuting party from those proceedings were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

By letter dated 25 March 2021, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 21 January 2021 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant received that letter on 9 April 2021. However, no response has followed.

THE LAW

In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application.

Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 2 December 2021.

{signature_p_2}

Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma Acting Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846