Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

BUZDUGAN AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL

Doc ref: 57569/18;11890/19;12476/19;16350/19;20114/19;23133/19;25337/19;25473/19;39454/19;40466/19;40468/19 • ECHR ID: 001-214610

Document date: November 25, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 4

BUZDUGAN AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL

Doc ref: 57569/18;11890/19;12476/19;16350/19;20114/19;23133/19;25337/19;25473/19;39454/19;40466/19;40468/19 • ECHR ID: 001-214610

Document date: November 25, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 57569/18 Ionel BUZDUGAN against Portugal and 10 other applications

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25 November 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Armen Harutyunyan, President, Jolien Schukking, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants;

Having regard to the fact that the Romanian Government did not express the wish to intervene in the present case with regard to applications nos. 57569/18, 11890/19, 20114/19, 25337/19, 25473/19, 39454/19, 40466/19 and 40468/19 (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 § 1 (a) of the Rules of Court);

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Portuguese Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

In the present applications, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that for the reasons stated below, the complaints about the conditions of detention are inadmissible.

The applicants were detained in different prison facilities. During their last, most recent and/or current, period of detention, the applicants were detained at Funchal Prison (applications nos. 57569/18 and 25337/19), Vale de Judeus Prison (applications nos. 16350/19 and 23133/19), Carregueira Prison (applications nos. 25473/19, 39454/19, 40466/19 and 40468/19), Linhó Prison (application no. 11890/19), Leiria Prison (application no. 12476/19) and Sintra Prison (application no. 20114/19).

Having regard to all of the available material and the parties’ arguments, the Court finds that it cannot be established that the applicants suffered in these prison facilities from severe overcrowding in detention of the kind that could entail, on its own, a violation of Article 3 (see Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, 20 October 2016). Nor can it be found that the cumulative effect of the other aspects of the detention which the applicants complained about reached the threshold of severity required to characterise the treatment as inhuman or degrading within the meaning of Article 3 (see, Bokor v. Portugal , no. 5227/18, § 34, 10 December 2020).

In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

2. Conditions of detention before their last prison transfer

Concerning applications nos. 57569/18, 11890/19, 16350/19, 20114/19, 23133/19, 25337/19, 25473/19, 40466/19 and 40468/19, in light of the conclusion above, the Court finds that the applicants’ transfer to the last prison facility interrupted the «continuing situation» of their conditions of detention. Therefore, the applicants’ complaints concerning the conditions of detention regarding the period prior to their last prison transfer are belated (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 77-78, 10 January 2012; and Eskerkhanov and Others v. Russia , nos. 18496/16 and 2 others, § 31, 25 July 2017) and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention.

Some applicants also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.

In applications nos. 11890/19, 12476/19, 25473/19, 39454/19, 40466/19, and 40468/19, relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicants complained of inhuman conditions of transport during their prison transfers. The Court notes that their most recent prison transfer had taken place more than six months before they lodged their applications with the Court. This complaint is thus belated and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention.

In applications nos. 16350/19 and 23133/19, invoking Article 8 of the Convention, the applicants complained that five-minute telephone calls per day were insufficient to maintain contact with their family and friends. The Court notes that this limitation is established in section 132 of the prison regulation. Furthermore, the Committee on the Prevention Against Torture (CPT) has considered five minutes per day of telephone calls to be satisfactory (see Bădulescu v. Portugal , no. 33729/18, §§ 36-37, 20 October 2020). Given the other means of communication available to the applicants as detainees to maintain contact with their family and friends, it follows that this complaint is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

In application no. 12476/19, under Article 13 of the Convention, the applicant complained of the lack of an effective remedy to complain against the poor conditions of detention in Portugal. The Court notes that, according to the Court’s established case-law, Article 13 applies only where an individual has an “arguable claim” to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom , 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131). Having regard to the findings above in respect of the applicant’s complaints under Article 3 about the conditions of detention, the Court concludes that he did not have an “arguable claim”, and that therefore Article 13 is not applicable. It follows that this complaint must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the applications inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 16 December 2021.

Viktoriya Maradudina Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

(inadequate conditions of detention)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Facility

Start and end date

Duration

Sq. m per inmate

Specific grievances

57569/18

26/11/2018

Ionel BUZDUGAN

1986Peter Irina Maria

Bucharest

Judicial Police Prison

06/11/2013 to

09/11/2013

4 days

Judicial Police Prison

09/11/2013 to

09/01/2014

2 months and 1 day

Lisbon Central Prison

09/01/2014 to

18/04/2017

3 years and 3 months and 10 days

Funchal Prison

05/05/2017 to

18/10/2018

1 year and 5 months and 14 days

7 inmates

1.9 m²

1 toilet

2 inmates

1.9 m²

1 toilet

2 inmates

4

1 toilet

1 inmate

5.7 m²

1 toilet

overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, mouldy or dirty cell, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or insufficient natural light, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen

idem

overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, mouldy or dirty cell, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or insufficient natural light, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen

mouldy or dirty cell, poor quality of food

11890/19

18/02/2019

Alexandru TAȘCĂ

1990Peter Irina Maria

Bucharest

Judicial Police Prison

09/03/2012 to

13/04/2012

1 month and 5 days

Caxias Prison

13/04/2012 to

26/06/2015

3 years and 2 months and 13 days

Linhó Prison

26/06/2015 to

05/10/2018

3 years and 3 months and 9 days

2 inmates

3

1 toilet

4 inmates

3

1 inmate

6.4 m²

1 toilet

poor quality of food, overcrowding, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, inadequate temperature, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities

poor quality of food, overcrowding, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, inadequate temperature, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities

poor quality of food, lack of fresh air

12476/19

22/02/2019

João Miguel SARREIRA ALBUQUERQUE

1973Carreto Vítor

Torres Vedras

Leiria Prison

05/07/2018 to

03/10/2019

1 year and 2 months and 27 days

9 inmates

3.3 m²

1 toilet

mouldy or dirty cell, noise

16350/19

19/03/2019

Mário GOMES REIS

1962Carreto Vítor

Torres Vedras

Coimbra Prison

03/02/1995 to

04/04/2014

19 years and 2 months and 2 days

Vale de Judeus Prison

04/04/2014

pending

More than 7 years and 6 months and 23 days

2 inmates

7

1 inmate

5.4 m²

1 toilet

mouldy or dirty cell, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, overcrowding, passive smoking, limited access to the telephone

mouldy or dirty cell, poor quality of food, limited access to the telephone

20114/19

01/04/2019

IonuÈ› GEMÄ‚NAR

1985Peter Irina Maria

Bucharest

Lisbon Judicial Police Prison

06/06/2015 to

26/06/2015

20 days

Lisbon Prison

27/06/2015 to

12/01/2018

2 years and 6 months and 17 days

Sintra Prison

12/01/2018 to

05/11/2018

9 months and 25 days

2 inmates

4.85 m²

2 inmates

5.2 m²

3 inmates or individual cells

>4.26 m²

1 toilet

overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of hygienic facilities for courtyards, poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, infestation of cells with insects, mouldy or dirty cells, small courtyards, no access to potable water, inadequate temperature during winter, lack of toiletries

overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of hygienic facilities for courtyards, poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, infestation of cells with insects, mouldy or dirty cells, small courtyards, no access to potable water, inadequate temperature during winter, lack of toiletries

lack of hygienic facilities for courtyards, small courtyards, lack of toiletries

23133/19

11/04/2019

Lúcio NUNES MARIA

1968Carreto Vítor

Torres Vedras

Torres Novas Police Prison

11/01/2012 to

13/01/2012

3 days

Torres Novas Prison

13/01/2012 to

23/01/2012

11 days

Lisbon Central Prison

23/01/2012 to

11/07/2013

1 year and 5 months and 20 days

Vale de Judeus Prison

11/07/2013 to 11/07/2019

6 years

1 inmate

7

1 toilet

1 inmate

5

1 toilet

1 inmate

5

1 toilet

1 inmate

6.9 m²

1 toilet

inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell

passive smoking, poor quality food, overcrowding, inadequate temperature, lack of access to warm water

passive smoking, poor quality food, insufficient quantity of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of toiletries, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of requisite medical assistance, overcrowding

insufficient quantity of food, lack of toiletries

25337/19

03/05/2019

Eugen-Iulius HANDUC

1978Peter Irina Maria

Bucharest

Lisbon Judicial Police Prison

07/12/2013 to

09/01/2014

1 month and 3 days

Lisbon Prison

09/01/2014 to

05/09/2016

2 years and 7 months and 28 days

Funchal Prison

05/09/2016 to

05/04/2019

2 years and 7 months and 1 day

2 inmates

4

1 toilet

3 inmates

2.6 m²

1 toilet

1 inmate

5.5 m²

1 toilet

overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of privacy for toilet, inadequate temperature during winter, poor quality of bedding and bed linen, insufficient natural light, mouldy or dirty cell, poor quality of food, flooded cells, infestation of cells with insects, lack of electric light, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to shower, concrete bed, lack of dental office

idem

poor quality of food, absence of a dental office

25473/19

03/05/2019

Ionel BENCHEA

1973Peter Irina Maria

Bucharest

Lisboa Judicial Police Prison

09/03/2012 to

13/04/2012

1 month and 5 days

Caxias Prison

13/04/2012 to

15/07/2015

3 years and 3 months and 3 days

Carregueira Prison

15/07/2015 to

12/07/2019

3 years and 11 months and 28 days

4 inmates

4

4 inmates

3

1 toilet

5 inmates

4,8 m²

1 toilet

bunk beds, poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, inadequate temperature during winter, mouldy or dirty cells, lack of fresh air, only having access to one telephone call per day, overcrowding

bunk beds, poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, inadequate temperature during winter, mouldy or dirty cells, lack of fresh air, only having access to one telephone call per day, overcrowding

poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food

39454/19

15/07/2019

Ioan ROSUÅž

1984Peter Irina Maria

Bucharest

Carregueira Prison

04/11/2011

pending

More than 9 years and 11 months and 23 days

5 inmates

4.6 m²

1 toilet

poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food

40466/19

15/07/2019

Ion RADU

1976Peter Irina Maria

Bucharest

Faro Prison

30/01/2007 to

06/02/2007

8 days

Lisbon Central Prison

06/02/2007 to

07/11/2008

1 year and 9 months and 2 days

Carregueira Prison

07/11/2008

pending

More than 12 years and 11 months and 20 days

21 inmates

2.6 m²

1 toilet

2 inmates

3

1 toilet

5 inmates

4.8 m²

1 toilet

overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air

overcrowding, bunk beds, poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, inadequate temperature during winter, mouldy or dirty cells, lack of fresh air

poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food

40468/19

15/07/2019

Dumitru PEKURA

1977Peter Irina Maria

Bucharest

Lisbon Central Prison

21/10/2001 to

05/12/2012

11 years and 1 month and 15 days

Carregueira Prison

05/12/2012 to

17/04/2019

6 years and 4 months and 13 days

2 inmates

3

1 toilet

5 inmates

4.6 m²

1 toilet

overcrowding, bunk beds, poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, inadequate temperature during winter, mouldy or dirty cells, lack of fresh air

poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255