Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

RAUDSEPP v. ESTONIA

Doc ref: 22392/20 • ECHR ID: 001-216594

Document date: February 24, 2022

  • Inbound citations: 1
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

RAUDSEPP v. ESTONIA

Doc ref: 22392/20 • ECHR ID: 001-216594

Document date: February 24, 2022

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 22392/20 Virgo RAUDSEPP

against Estonia

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 24 February 2022 as a Committee composed of:

Andreas Zünd, President, Peeter Roosma, Mikhail Lobov, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 16 May 2020,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 8 in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention concerning the impossibility to have long-term visits with family members as a remand prisoner and as a convicted prisoner under a reception regime were communicated to the Estonian Government (“the Government”).

The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Estonia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay him the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.

THE LAW

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 17 March 2022.

Viktoriya Maradudina Andreas Zünd Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application raising complaints under Article 8 in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention

(lack of long-term family visits for prisoners)

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Date of receipt of Government’s declaration

Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration

Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses

per applicant

(in euros) [1]

22392/20

16/05/2020

Virgo RAUDSEPP

1973

24/09/2021

24/11/2021

2,000

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846