THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 62986/09 Ardian KALIA against Albania

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 10 March 2022 as a Committee composed of:

Peeter Roosma, President, Andreas Zünd, Mikhail Lobov, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 26 November 2009,

Having regard to the declaration submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases, and the applicant’s reply to this declaration,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table.

The applicant was represented by Mr A. Hajdari, a lawyer practising in Tirana.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of the Constitutional Court’s decision of 30 April 2001 and about the length of the proceedings were communicated to the Albanian Government (“the Government”).

The Government submitted a declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the application.

The Government acknowledged that there had been a breach of the reasonable-time requirement under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in the applicant’s case. The Government informed the Court that the final decision had been enforced in full by the High Council of Justice’s decision no. 268 dated 15 September 2010, which had ordered the applicant’s reinstatement to his previous position. They offered to pay the applicant the amount detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases. The amount would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.

The applicant informed the Court that he agreed to the terms of the declaration.

THE LAW

The Court finds that, following the applicant’s express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 31 March 2022.

Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention

(non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions)

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Date of receipt of Government’s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance

Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses

(in euros) [1]

62986/09

26/11/2009

Ardian KALIA

1969Hajdari Artan

Tirana

18/11/2021

10/01/2022

5,000

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.