Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

FERREIRA ESTEVAM v. PORTUGAL

Doc ref: 24779/20 • ECHR ID: 001-216806

Document date: March 10, 2022

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

FERREIRA ESTEVAM v. PORTUGAL

Doc ref: 24779/20 • ECHR ID: 001-216806

Document date: March 10, 2022

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 24779/20 Alberto FERREIRA ESTEVAM against Portugal

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 10 March 2022 as a Committee composed of:

Armen Harutyunyan, President, Jolien Schukking, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 8 June 2020,

Having regard to the declaration submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases, and the applicant’s reply to this declaration,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table. He was represented by Mr V. Carreto, a lawyer practising in Torres Vedras.

The applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the lack of an effective remedy were communicated to the Portuguese Government (“the Government”).

The Government submitted a declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the application.

The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. They offered to pay the applicant the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.

The applicant informed the Court that he agreed to the terms of the declaration.

THE LAW

The Court finds that, following the applicant’s express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application in the part concerning the applicant’s conditions of detention.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the part of the case concerning the applicant’s conditions of detention out of the list.

In so far as the applicant referred to Article 13 of the Convention, the Court, in the light of the above friendly settlement agreement, does not consider it necessary to examine separately that complaint.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in the part concerning the applicant’s conditions of detention in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention;

Decides that there is no need to examine separately the complaint under Article 13 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 31 March 2022.

Viktoriya Maradudina Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

(inadequate conditions of detention)

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government’s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

(in euros) [1]

Amount awarded for costs and expenses

(in euros) [2]

24779/20

08/06/2020

Alberto FERREIRA ESTEVAM

1949Vítor Carreto

Torres Vedras

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

31/01/2022

13/02/2022

2,000

250[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.

[2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255