Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ÖZGÜRLÜK VE DAYANIŞMA PARTİSİ (ÖDP) v. TURKEYJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES TULKENS AND SAJÓ
CASE OF L.B. v. HUNGARYJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES WOJTYCZEK AND PACZOLAY
Judgment of the Court of 26 November 2002. European Community, represented by the Commission of the European Communities v First NV and Franex NV.
CASE OF LYUBOMIR POPOV v. BULGARIA
CASE OF AYAN v. TURKEY
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1295 of 1 August 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1469 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating in Russia and Ukraine, following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Commission Directive 2006/27/EC of 3 March 2006 amending for the purposes of adapting to technical progress Council Directives 93/14/EEC on the braking of two- or three-wheel motor vehicles and 93/34/EEC on statutory markings for two- or three-wheel motor vehicles, Directives of the European Parliament and of the Council 95/1/EC on the maximum design speed, maximum torque and maximum net engine power of two- or three-wheel motor vehicles and 97/24/EC on certain components and characteristics of two- or three-wheel motor vehicles (Text with EEA relevance)

Document text Analytics

SAID v. MALTA

Doc ref: 34562/20 • ECHR ID: 001-217220

Document date: March 22, 2022

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 16

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

v unique documents citing • R citations total to L paragraphs

Outbound citations

En unique documents cited • 2F citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846