Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ĆWIK v. POLANDJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES WOJTYCZEK AND PEJCHAL
CASE OF VELJKOV v. SERBIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DAVID THÓR BJÖRGVINSSON
AGOSI (ALLGEMEINE GOLD- und SILBERSCHEIDEANSTALT A.G.) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 24 October 2013. European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.
CASES OF MILEN KOSTOV AND NASKO GEORGIEV AGAINST BULGARIA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2345/86 of 25 July 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1726/82 determining intervention centres for colza, rape and sunflower seed
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1371/95 of 16 June 1995 laying down detailed rules for implementing the system of export licences in the egg sector
CASE OF ROMANKEVIČ v. LITHUANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KJØLBRO
AFFAIRE PEDERSEN ET AUTRES CONTRE LA NORVÈGE ET 5 AUTRES AFFAIRES
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 273/90 of 30 January 1990 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods

Document text Analytics

CASE OF BUMBEȘ v. ROMANIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

Doc ref: 18079/15 • ECHR ID: 001-216937

Document date: May 3, 2022

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 62

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

H unique documents citing • h citations total to R paragraphs

Outbound citations

j5 unique documents cited • T9 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846