ANDÓ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Doc ref: 18225/21;53324/21;54447/21;60569/21;61381/21 • ECHR ID: 001-219436
Document date: August 25, 2022
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 18225/21 Róbert ANDÓ against Hungary and 4 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 25 August 2022 as a Committee composed of:
Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President,
Erik Wennerström ,
Lorraine Schembri Orland , judges,
and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”).
The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 15 September 2022.
Attila Teplán Krzysztof Wojtyczek Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of criminal proceedings)
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros) [1]
18225/21
26/03/2021
Róbert ANDÓ
1985Tímár Mátyás Sándor
Nagykörös
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
30/11/2021
09/05/2022
2,300
53324/21
13/10/2021
Gábor Róbert TÁPAI
1972Bene Zoltán
Szeged
05/04/2022
07/03/2022
4,600
54447/21
25/10/2021
Attila TÓTH
1972Kozák Andrea
Miskolc
13/05/2022
08/04/2022
3,200
60569/21
08/12/2021
János SARKADI
1987Bene Zoltán
Szeged
03/06/2022
01/04/2022
3,200
61381/21
11/12/2021
Katalin BOLDOGNÉ ORBÁN
1975
10/05/2022
13/06/2022
1,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.