CASE OF SEVİNÇ AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE
Doc ref: 63634/16, 14439/17, 14942/17, 14976/17, 34032/17, 40177/17, 41766/17, 41864/17, 43739/17, 45034/17, ... • ECHR ID: 001-219983
Document date: October 18, 2022
- Inbound citations: 1
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 2
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF SEVİNÇ AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE
(Applications nos. 63634/16 and 134 others
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
18 October 2022
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Sevinç and Others v. Türkiye,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Branko Lubarda , President,
Jovan Ilievski ,
Diana Sârcu , judges,
and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to:
the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by one hundred and thirty-five Turkish nationals, whose relevant details are listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein;
the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning the lawfulness and length of pre-trial detention and the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion regarding the commission of an offence, the alleged lack of prompt information of the reasons for the applicants’ arrest and of any charge against them, as well as the ineffectiveness of judicial review of the lawfulness of detention, the absence of a remedy to obtain compensation and the lawfulness of the searches conducted by the authorities to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) represented by their Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications;
the parties’ observations;
the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;
Having deliberated in private on 27 September 2022,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” ( Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması , hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (further information regarding the events that unfolded after the coup attempt, including the details of the state of emergency declared by the respondent Government and the ensuing notice of derogation given to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, as well as the legislative developments that followed the declaration of the state of emergency, may be found in the case of BaÅŸ v. Turkey , no. 66448/17, §§ 6 ‑ 14 and §§ 109-10, 3 March 2020). All of the applicants were serving as ordinary judges or prosecutors at different types and/or levels of court, subject to Law no. 2802 on judges and prosecutors (“Law no. 2802”) (see BaÅŸ , cited above, §§ 66-67), at the material time.
2. On 16 July 2016 the Ankara chief public prosecutor’s office initiated a criminal investigation into, inter alios , the suspected members of FETÖ/PDY within the judiciary in accordance with the provisions of the ordinary law, on the ground that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto falling within the jurisdiction of the assize courts (further information regarding the orders issued by the chief public prosecutor’s office within the context of that investigation, as well as the ensuing suspensions and dismissals of judges and prosecutors suspected of being members of FETÖ/PDY, may be found in Baş , cited above, §§ 9-10 and 15-21).
3. Following their arrest and detention in police custody on the orders of the regional and provincial prosecutors’ offices, the applicants were placed in pre-trial detention on various dates, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY organisation, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş , cited above, § 58). The pre-trial detention decisions were issued by the magistrates’ courts located at the respective places of the applicants’ arrest. In the majority of the decisions, it was noted specifically that the criminal investigation was governed by the ordinary rules, given that the offence of which the suspects were accused, namely membership of an armed terrorist organisation, was a “continuing offence” and that there was a case of discovery in flagrante delicto governed by the relevant provisions of domestic law (see Baş , cited above, § 67).
4. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts, and a few were acquitted. It appears that, for the most part, the appeal proceedings are still pending.
5. In the meantime, the applicants lodged individual applications with the Constitutional Court in respect of, inter alia , the alleged violation of their right to liberty and security on various accounts, including the alleged unlawfulness of their detention by reason of the disregard of the procedural safeguards afforded to members of the judiciary in domestic law, all of which were declared inadmissible (compare also Turan and Others v. Turkey , nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 26-27, 23 November 2021).
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT
6. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
7. The applicants complained under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention that they had been placed in pre-trial detention in breach of the domestic laws governing the arrest and pre-trial detention of the members of the judiciary and disputed that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto for the purposes of section 94 of Law no. 2802 (see Baş , cited above, § 67).
8. The Government invited the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible for the reasons that they had raised in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 55). They also added that one of the applicants (application no. 38986/19) had been granted some compensation by the Constitutional Court, which had found that the said applicant’s detention had not been based on a reasonable suspicion. The Court notes that similar objections raised by the Government have already been dismissed in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 57-64) and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. It notes in particular the absence of any finding in respect of the applicant in application no. 38986/19 constituting an acknowledgement that his placement in pre-trial detention had not been in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law and thereby removing his victim status in that regard. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.
9. The Court further considers, having regard to its findings in the cases of BaÅŸ and Turan and Others (both cited above, §§ 143-58 and §§ 79-92 respectively), that the pre-trial detention of the applicants had not taken place in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and that, therefore, there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 on account of the unlawfulness of the applicants’ initial pre ‑ trial detention. Moreover, while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (compare BaÅŸ , cited above, §§ 115-16 and §§ 159 ‑ 62, and Turan and Others , cited above, § 91).
10. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and Article 8 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
11. The applicants requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. Most of the applicants also claimed pecuniary damage, corresponding mainly to their loss of earnings resulting from their dismissal, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.
12. The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.
13. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102 ‑ 07), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on this amount, which is to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 October 2022, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Dorothee von Arnim Branko Lubarda Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of cases:
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant Date of Birth
Represented by
63634/16
Sevinç v. Türkiye
27/10/2016
Şamil SEVİNÇ 05/01/1973
14439/17
Özalp v. Türkiye
12/01/2017
Faruk ÖZALP 10/11/1984
Mesut BAÅžOL
14942/17
Ulak v. Türkiye
05/01/2017
Mustafa Yener ULAK 11/05/1969
14976/17
Altun v. Türkiye
11/01/2017
Mustafa ALTUN 29/01/1979
Ä°rem TATLIDEDE
34032/17
Sarı v. Türkiye
10/03/2017
Mehmet SARI 01/01/1971
Ä°rem TATLIDEDE
40177/17
Bekri v. Türkiye
16/01/2017
Muhammet Nedim BEKRÄ° 05/10/1979
Tülin BEKRİ
41766/17
Çakır v. Türkiye
12/05/2017
Abdulkadir ÇAKIR 20/03/1971
Zehra KILIÇ
41864/17
Üşümez v. Türkiye
28/04/2017
İzzettin ÜŞÜMEZ 30/03/1974
Åžefik KARAKIÅž
43739/17
Acu v. Türkiye
04/04/2017
Nedim ACU 01/07/1974
Ä°rem TATLIDEDE
45034/17
Balık v. Türkiye
05/05/2017
Ä°brahim BALIK 02/07/1973
Doğan Güney YILMAZ
48010/17
Çakmak v. Türkiye
23/06/2017
Seyfullah ÇAKMAK 22/03/1971
Gökhan DİRİCAN
49244/17
Uslu v. Türkiye
29/03/2017
Nihal USLU 02/07/1969
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
58673/17
Okur v. Türkiye
20/07/2017
Orhan Yavuz OKUR 14/02/1989
62627/17
Karaduman v. Türkiye
15/06/2017
Mehmet KARADUMAN 01/10/1991
Sevgi KOÇER VAROL
62735/17
Dede v. Türkiye
24/01/2017
Hakan DEDE 12/06/1968
Elkan ALBAYRAK
63197/17
Binici v. Türkiye
26/05/2017
Burhan BÄ°NÄ°CÄ° 26/01/1973
Büşra BİNİCİ
63650/17
Kandemir v. Türkiye
15/02/2017
Osman KANDEMÄ°R 07/02/1974
Ahmet Can DEMÄ°RCÄ°
66402/17
Babayiğit v. Türkiye
16/01/2017
Mustafa BABAYİĞİT 01/10/1978
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
67340/17
Ünal v. Türkiye
17/08/2017
Kamber ÃœNAL 01/12/1968
68205/17
Kayın v. Türkiye
13/01/2017
Mustafa KAYIN 24/12/1968
M. Aytaç POYRAZ
69728/17
Mercimek v. Türkiye
03/08/2017
Hamza MERCÄ°MEK
20/11/1976
Memnune AKYILDIZ
79642/17
Kartal v. Türkiye
27/10/2017
Kadir KARTAL 29/07/1981
80957/17
Şen v. Türkiye
06/11/2017
Yavuz ÅžEN 03/03/1979
Elif Nurbanu OR
6919/18
Çelik v. Türkiye
19/01/2018
Adem ÇELİK 29/09/1980
Muhammed ÇELİK
16155/18
Özkan v. Türkiye
14/03/2018
Ercan ÖZKAN 04/04/1976
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
23455/18
Demir v. Türkiye
30/04/2018
Ä°brahim DEMÄ°R 24/03/1974
25201/18
Günal v. Türkiye
26/05/2018
Erol GÃœNAL 29/08/1978
Muhammet Talha BOL
29932/18
Yıldız v. Türkiye
29/05/2018
Serkan YILDIZ 15/10/1983
35634/18
Demir v. Türkiye
13/07/2018
Ä°lhami DEMÄ°R 15/06/1983
Cihat ÇITIR
43696/18
İ.Ö. v. Türkiye
11/09/2018
İ.Ö. 05/05/1988
Asım Burak GÜNEŞ
11854/19
Bektaş v. Türkiye
04/02/2019
Hakan BEKTAÅž 01/03/1986
Ä°lhan YILDIZ
13857/19
Sayılgan v. Türkiye
08/03/2019
Cengiz SAYILGAN 01/01/1969
MenekÅŸe Merve TEKTEN
14274/19
Şayık v. Türkiye
28/02/2019
Hüsnü Sidal ŞAYIK 19/06/1978
15881/19
Akbaba v. Türkiye
07/03/2019
Ä°lhami AKBABA 21/08/1985
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
15995/19
Uzun v. Türkiye
03/01/2019
Selim UZUN 28/11/1982
Tufan YILMAZ
16213/19
Dağlı v. Türkiye
21/11/2018
Neslihan DAÄžLI 04/06/1981
16424/19
Yediyıldız v. Türkiye
28/02/2019
Ali Cihan YEDÄ°YILDIZ 25/11/1983
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
17501/19
Benli v. Türkiye
11/03/2019
Salih BENLÄ° 10/10/1976
Çağrı Seyfettin GÖKDEMİR
17527/19
Altunbey v. Türkiye
18/03/2019
Sameddin ALTUNBEY 01/07/1980
17548/19
Kesim v. Türkiye
13/03/2019
Yahya KESÄ°M 20/11/1965
17780/19
Kaya v. Türkiye
18/03/2019
Salih KAYA 10/04/1967
Barış BAYHAN
18787/19
Canoğlu v. Türkiye
19/03/2019
Bülent CANOĞLU 01/03/1974
Vedi YÃœCETAÅž
19743/19
A.B. v. Türkiye
29/03/2019
A.B. 07/01/1984
Cihat ÇITIR
20067/19
Uzun v. Türkiye
30/03/2019
Mehmet Burak UZUN 24/06/1981
20293/19
Acar v. Türkiye
29/03/2019
Metin ACAR 02/03/1981
Serdar Numan BAÅžARAN
20749/19
Dalkılıç v. Türkiye
01/04/2019
Süleyman DALKILIÇ 06/11/1989
Meryem YAÅžAR
21017/19
Kaya v. Türkiye
02/04/2019
Ahmet KAYA 24/07/1966
Afra Ece KAYA
21248/19
Gürpınar v. Türkiye
05/04/2019
Mehmet Hakkı GÜRPINAR 18/12/1972
Ä°lyas TEKÄ°N
21260/19
Kartal v. Türkiye
12/04/2019
Adem KARTAL 01/01/1972
Kamile KILDAN
21968/19
Arı v. Türkiye
19/04/2019
Vahip ARI 10/06/1981
Hasan AÄžIRTAÅž
22462/19
İnce v. Türkiye
17/04/2019
Süleyman İNCE 15/12/1969
22482/19
Pehlivan v. Türkiye
12/04/2019
Ä°lyas PEHLÄ°VAN 27/08/1973
22731/19
Bulut v. Türkiye
09/04/2019
Nurettin BULUT 25/05/1978
AyÅŸe Sibel TORUN
22734/19
Öztürk v. Türkiye
17/04/2019
Hakan ÖZTÜRK 03/03/1974
Zülal ÜNSAL
23438/19
Yıldırımer v. Türkiye
26/04/2019
Engin YILDIRIMER 20/01/1984
23673/19
Ayanoğlu v. Türkiye
24/04/2019
Hüseyin AYANOĞLU 20/11/1972
Ä°hsan MAKAS
23953/19
Arslan v. Türkiye
24/04/2019
Murat ARSLAN 30/07/1977
24366/19
Aksakal v. Türkiye
17/04/2019
Taner AKSAKAL 13/09/1970
Ebubekir RENK
24387/19
Çavdar v. Türkiye
24/04/2019
Kemal ÇAVDAR 09/09/1982
Mustafa ÇAVDAR
24668/19
Yenitepe v. Türkiye
29/04/2019
Zafer YENÄ°TEPE 04/12/1970
Abdullah YALÇINKAYA
24755/19
Sırıklıgil v. Türkiye
03/05/2019
Ali SIRIKLIGÄ°L 01/10/1980
Ä°hsan MAKAS
24760/19
Ovacıklı v. Türkiye
29/04/2019
Sadullah OVACIKLI 18/12/1979
24939/19
Bayır v. Türkiye
24/04/2019
Can BAYIR 16/04/1976
25151/19
Bayman v. Türkiye
22/04/2019
Ä°brahim BAYMAN 21/08/1969
25409/19
Kavak v. Türkiye
03/05/2019
Durdu KAVAK 02/06/1965
Hidayet Elif VURAL
25701/19
Kılıç v. Türkiye
30/04/2019
Eyüp KILIÇ 02/06/1979
Enes Malik KILIÇ
25759/19
Varol v. Türkiye
24/04/2019
Esra VAROL 05/04/1982
Ä°lyas TEKÄ°N
25777/19
Tekkoyun v. Türkiye
02/05/2019
Mehmet TEKKOYUN 05/09/1978
Ä°brahim KOCAOÄžUL
25907/19
Özdemir v. Türkiye
17/04/2019
Hasan ÖZDEMİR 14/05/1973
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
25912/19
Tombak v. Türkiye
19/04/2019
Eren TOMBAK 01/06/1989
Tufan YILMAZ
26080/19
Öztürk v. Türkiye
08/05/2019
Veysi ÖZTÜRK 12/10/1984
Ferat ÇAĞIL
26282/19
Ayaz v. Türkiye
30/04/2019
Eslem AYAZ 05/02/1982
26378/19
Bağırcı v. Türkiye
14/05/2019
Hasan Tarık BAĞIRCI 18/08/1990
Muhammet GÃœNEY
26525/19
Etöz v. Türkiye
02/05/2019
İsmail ETÖZ 04/06/1990
26769/19
Özcan v. Türkiye
20/04/2019
Musa ÖZCAN 16/09/1985
Sabahattin GÖÇMEN
27075/19
Yıldırım v. Türkiye
30/04/2019
Mükremin YILDIRIM 01/03/1981
Muhammet GÃœNEY
27141/19
Öcal v. Türkiye
09/05/2019
Ziya ÖCAL 16/02/1979
Kazım KASA
27501/19
Çelik v. Türkiye
15/05/2019
İsa ÇELİK 02/06/1974
Kamile KILDAN
27577/19
Kavak v. Türkiye
26/04/2019
Tarık KAVAK 02/04/1976
Güntaç DEĞER
27686/19
Arslan v. Türkiye
29/04/2019
Mustafa ARSLAN 08/04/1988
27739/19
Özçelik v. Türkiye
30/04/2019
İlkay ÖZÇELİK 12/01/1979
28703/19
Yetişgen v. Türkiye
03/05/2019
Resul YETÄ°ÅžGEN 01/04/1974
Ahmet OKU
28935/19
Toltar v. Türkiye
07/05/2019
Yusuf TOLTAR 11/02/1988
Emre AKARYILDIZ
28963/19
Şenses v. Türkiye
15/05/2019
Ãœmit ÅžENSES 21/06/1984
Sinan KARAHAN
29438/19
Aydın v. Türkiye
10/05/2019
Aykut AYDIN 22/12/1990
30478/19
Oruç v. Türkiye
27/05/2019
Bahadır ORUÇ 01/04/1980
Cengiz BALCI
30481/19
Önder v. Türkiye
27/05/2019
Yusuf ÖNDER 20/02/1974
Celal SÖYLEMEZ
30485/19
Dal v. Türkiye
10/05/2019
Hasan Tahsin DAL 01/01/1981
Nurhan ÖZDURAN
30865/19
Ocak v. Türkiye
29/05/2019
Ãœmit OCAK 30/10/1974
Kamile KILDAN
31626/19
Uysal v. Türkiye
20/05/2019
Ömer UYSAL 16/06/1969
32316/19
Bozkurt v. Türkiye
10/06/2019
Yeliz BOZKURT 01/03/1978
Muhterem SAYAN
32943/19
Aydın v. Türkiye
29/05/2019
UÄŸur AYDIN 08/06/1984
33224/19
Acar v. Türkiye
07/06/2019
Bilal ACAR 13/01/1981
34173/19
Yurt v. Türkiye
17/06/2019
Bahattin YURT 01/07/1975
Ä°rem TATLIDEDE
35008/19
Kayalar v. Türkiye
02/07/2019
Yasin KAYALAR 12/10/1983
Engin KARA
35059/19
Aydın v. Türkiye
02/07/2019
Adem AYDIN 22/05/1988
Fatma Serpil AYDIN
35075/19
Yücel v. Türkiye
02/07/2019
Sırrı YÜCEL 17/02/1971
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
35089/19
Arslan v. Türkiye
14/06/2019
Mahmut ARSLAN 15/01/1978
Ä°hsan MAKAS
35107/19
Devran v. Türkiye
28/06/2019
Talha DEVRAN 25/10/1990
Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ
35366/19
Bozoğlu v. Türkiye
17/06/2019
Ömer BOZOĞLU 18/01/1980
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
35588/19
Alıcı v. Türkiye
25/06/2019
Cebrail Cem ALICI 10/01/1973
Sefanur BOZGÖZ
35824/19
Gemici v. Türkiye
31/05/2019
Remzi GEMÄ°CÄ° 02/08/1969
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
35885/19
Demir v. Türkiye
18/06/2019
Timur DEMÄ°R 24/09/1977
Handan CAN
35891/19
Özdemir v. Türkiye
17/06/2019
Ali ÖZDEMİR 04/04/1976
Fatma KOCAEL
36055/19
Gökgöz v. Türkiye
27/06/2019
Mustafa GÖKGÖZ 01/05/1965
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
36208/19
Doğan v. Türkiye
21/06/2019
Erdem DOÄžAN 06/08/1977
Muhammet GÃœNEY
36383/19
Yalçınkaya v. Türkiye
27/06/2019
Mehmet Arif YALÇINKAYA 17/11/1983
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
36783/19
Demirel v. Türkiye
28/06/2019
Ä°rfan DEMÄ°REL 20/03/1974
Oktay BÄ°LGÄ°N
36828/19
Aydın v. Türkiye
01/07/2019
Emin AYDIN 15/08/1979
Mehmet AKÇAKOCA
36871/19
Ejder v. Türkiye
01/07/2019
Muhammet Emre EJDER 06/04/1974
Özcan AKINCI
37238/19
Aytaç v. Türkiye
03/07/2019
İsmail AYTAÇ 01/08/1973
Emin BAYRAM
37749/19
Eröz v. Türkiye
18/06/2019
İsmail Hakkı ERÖZ 22/02/1969
Leman TALASLIOÄžLU
38054/19
Tansel v. Türkiye
28/06/2019
Ferhat TANSEL 08/01/1977
Mevlit ERMÄ°Åž
38392/19
Çatal v. Türkiye
16/07/2019
Ali ÇATAL 16/09/1972
T. Mertcan SEYMEN
38449/19
Çabuk v. Türkiye
05/07/2019
Mehmet ÇABUK 01/03/1972
38528/19
Ayan v. Türkiye
04/07/2019
Mahmut AYAN 05/01/1981
38986/19
Demir v. Türkiye
09/07/2019
Nuran DEMÄ°R 10/03/1979
39217/19
Tanrıöver v. Türkiye
10/07/2019
Mehmet TANRIÖVER 30/07/1985
Veysel MALKOÇ
39485/19
Kara v. Türkiye
12/07/2019
Engin KARA 09/09/1985
Onur GÃœNDEM
39599/19
Yılmaz v. Türkiye
09/07/2019
Mustafa YILMAZ 09/10/1969
Mustafa Emre ÅžAHÄ°N
39778/19
Doğan v. Türkiye
19/07/2019
Lokman DOÄžAN 13/08/1971
40949/19
Yavuz v. Türkiye
17/07/2019
Hüseyin YAVUZ 10/08/1980
Ahmet ÇEVİK
41060/19
Baki v. Türkiye
20/07/2019
Bülent BAKİ 19/12/1974
Elkan ALBAYRAK
41129/19
Gürsoy Fırat v. Türkiye
22/07/2019
Gülüzar GÜRSOY FIRAT 12/04/1972
Ä°rem TATLIDEDE
41261/19
Kuvel v. Türkiye
22/07/2019
Ä°lyas KUVEL 01/11/1974
Emre AKARYILDIZ
41667/19
Gürel Aygün v. Türkiye
29/05/2019
Nur GÃœREL AYGÃœN 28/07/1988
Yasemin BAL
42065/19
R.M. v. Türkiye
22/07/2019
R.M. 09/04/1969
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
42479/19
Er v. Türkiye
29/07/2019
Fatih ER 29/03/1975
Bekir DÖNMEZ
42974/19
Şengül v. Türkiye
29/07/2019
Ömer ŞENGÜL 22/01/1978
Mahmut ÇİFTÇİ
43617/19
Özçelik v. Türkiye
01/07/2019
Yusuf ÖZÇELİK 14/07/1983
Adnan ZEYBEK
44708/19
Akyol v. Türkiye
09/08/2019
Ramazan AKYOL 15/11/1970
Yakup TAÅžCI
47050/19
Sarıkaya v. Türkiye
28/08/2019
Ramazan SARIKAYA 15/07/1982
Mahmut ÇİFTÇİ
48100/19
Nas v. Türkiye
24/08/2019
Mehmet RaÅŸit NAS 11/12/1983
Mehmet Akif CANPOLAT
51627/19
Şahin v. Türkiye
27/08/2019
Ä°brahim ÅžAHÄ°N 05/12/1980
Ömer Faruk ERGÜN
51686/19
Çivi v. Türkiye
01/10/2019
Erdinç ÇİVİ 29/08/1974