Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ŞIK v. TURKEY (No. 2)PARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE YÃœKSEL
CASE OF SZÉL AND OTHERS v. HUNGARYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE K Ū RIS
CASE OF I.P. v. POLAND
CASE OF KHABIROV v. RUSSIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SEIBERT-FOHR JOINED BY JUDGE ZÃœND
CASE OF TURAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOSKELO, JOINED BY JUDGE RANZONI
Commission Regulation (EU) No 89/2011 of 2 February 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
2009/613/EC: Commission Decision of 8 April 2009 on the measures C 7/07 (ex NN 82/06 and NN 83/06) implemented by the United Kingdom in favour of Royal Mail (Notified under document C(2009) 2486) (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARKADDITIONAL DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOUROU-VIKSTRÖM (ON PARAGRAPH 7 OF THE COMMON DISSENTING OPINION)
CASE OF OSVATH AGAINST HUNGARY
CASE OF VISKUPOVÁ AND OTHERS AGAINST SLOVAKIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF STALLINGER AND KUSO v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 14696/89;14697/89 • ECHR ID: 001-58029

Document date: April 23, 1997

Inbound citations: 8
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Y unique documents citing • W citations total to 7 paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846