Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF NARINEN v. FINLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARUSTE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1500/98 of 14 July 1998 establishing projected regional reference amounts and the value of the advance payments to be made to producers of soya beans, rapeseed and sunflower seed for the 1998/99 marketing year
CASE OF ROCHE v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ZUPANÄŒIÄŒ
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1969/2005 of 1 December 2005 concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005
CASE OF STEFAN ILIEV v. BULGARIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES LORENZEN, JUNGWIERT AND MARUSTE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 5/2000 of 3 January 2000 on the issuing of a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the internal market of 28 429 tonnes of maize held by the French intervention agency
CASE OF RACOLTEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF LJATIFI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EICKE

Document text Analytics

CASE OF FERRARI v. ITALY

Doc ref: 33440/96 • ECHR ID: 001-58296

Document date: July 28, 1999

Inbound citations: 12
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Ga unique documents citing • Qw citations total to u paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846