Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF BAZIL v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF ŻUK v. POLAND
Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2002 of 10 January 2002 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
CASE OF RABAN v. ROMANIA
CASE OF KARAMAN AND BEYAZIT v. TURKEY
CASE OF BUKTA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1156/93 of 12 May 1993 laying down detailed rules for the application in the pigmeat sector of the Bilateral Agreements on agriculture between the Community, of the one part, and Austria and Finland, of the other part
CASE OF AKDİVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (ARTICLE 50)DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GÖLCÜKLÜ
CASE OF DRAGOVAN v. SLOVENIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1558/2004 of 30 August 2004 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

Document text Analytics

CASE OF ROSSLHUBER v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 32869/96 • ECHR ID: 001-59053

Document date: November 28, 2000

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

n unique documents cited • r citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846