Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF FEJES v. HUNGARY
Council Regulation (EC) No 146/2008 of 14 February 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
CASE OF RUDENKO v. UKRAINE
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3782/92 of 28 December 1992 on the sale by the procedure laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 2539/84 of bone-in beef held by certain intervention agencies and intended for export, repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2315/92 and (EEC) No 3028/92
Commission Regulation (EC) No 17/2008 of 10 January 2008 fixing the export refunds on white and raw sugar exported without further processing
CASE OF W.B. v. POLAND
CASE OF HAGERT v. FINLAND
CASE OF AVSAR v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GÖLCÜKLÜ
CASE OF OBSERVER AND GUARDIAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA
CASE OF KAZARTSEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF BASPINAR v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 29280/95 • ECHR ID: 001-59856

Document date: October 30, 2001

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 4

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

J unique documents cited • M citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846