Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF TSFAYO v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BORREGO BORREGO
Council Decision of 6 February 2023 amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national central banks, as regards the external auditors of Oesterreichische Nationalbank 2023/C 48/03
CASE OF BEKOS AND KOUTROPOULOS v. GREECESEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2293/92 of 31 July 1992 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 with regard to the set-aside scheme referred to in Article 7
CASE OF ÇAMLIBEL v. TURKEY
CASE OF OYAL v. TURKEYPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 748/2011 of 28 July 2011 amending for the 153rd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban
CASE OF SUBICKA v. POLAND (No. 2)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MIJOVIĆ
CASE OF LEPOJIC v. SERBIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA
CASE OF KUNITSYNA v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV

Document text Analytics

CASE OF LISIAK v. POLAND

Doc ref: 37443/97 • ECHR ID: 001-60717

Document date: November 5, 2002

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 1

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

u unique documents cited • W citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846