Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF S.M. v. CROATIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE PASTOR VILANOVA
CASE OF LUEDICKE, BELKACEM AND KOÇ v. GERMANYSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LAGERGREN
CASE OF CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S PARTY v. MOLDOVAPARTLY CONCURRING, PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PAVLOVSCHI
CASE OF JARZYNSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VILLIGER
CASE OF COBAN v. TURKEY
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 94/84 of 13 January 1984 altering the basic amount of the import levies on syrups and certain other products in the sugar sector
CASE OF BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOMSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
CASE OF REINHARDT AND SLIMANE-KAÏD v. FRANCEpartly dissenting OPINION OF JUDGE De Meyer

Document text Analytics

CASE OF SAVIO v. ITALY

Doc ref: 31012/96 • ECHR ID: 001-60836

Document date: December 19, 2002

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

A unique documents citing • 9 citations total to 5 paragraphs

Outbound citations

k unique documents cited • S citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846