Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF BOCHKAREVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF RUIZ RIVERA v. SWITZERLAND [Extracts]DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LORENZEN
CASE OF YAYAN v. TURKEY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1042/2006 of 7 July 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Article 28(3) and (4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy
CASE OF RUOHO v. FINLAND
CASE OF ARVANITAKI-ROBOTI AND OTHERS v. GREECE
CASE OF B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOMINDIVIDUAL SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
EC: Commission Decision of 11 December 2007 on the State aid case C 53/06 (ex N 262/05, ex CP 127/04), investment by the city of Amsterdam in a fibre-to-the-home (FttH) network (notified under document number C(2007) 6072) (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF BARILLON v. FRANCE
KATAJEVS v. LATVIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF LUTZ v. FRANCE (No. 2)

Doc ref: 49531/99 • ECHR ID: 001-61151

Document date: June 17, 2003

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846