Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF YİĞİT v. TURKEY
COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2594/93 of 22 September 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2293/92 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 with regard to the set-aside scheme referred to in Article 7
CASE OF KVARTUC AGAINST CROATIA AND 2 OTHER CASES
Commission Regulation (EC) No 12/2006 of 5 January 2006 fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2093/2005
CASE OF ŞAHİN ÇAĞDAŞ v. TURKEY
CASE OF FARCAS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF PROBSTMEIER v. GERMANYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE FOIGHEL
CASE OF RAMANAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA (No. 2)CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 501/2001 of 14 March 2001 on the authorisation of transfers between the quantitative limits of textiles and clothing products originating in the People's Republic of China
Commission Regulation (EC) No 91/2002 of 17 January 2002 fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 9/2002

Document text Analytics

CASE OF WIDMANN v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 42032/98 • ECHR ID: 001-61166

Document date: June 19, 2003

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 5

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

e unique documents cited • e citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846