Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SALMANOĞLU AND POLATTAŞ v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S SAJ Ó , TSOTSORIA AND KARAKA Ş
CASE OF PATSURIA v. GEORGIAPARTLY CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MULARONI, JOINED BY JUDGE ZAGREBELSKY
CASE OF FRETTE v. FRANCEJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE Sir Nicolas BRATZA AND JUDGES FUHRMANN AND TULKENS
CASE OF KONDRATYEV v. UKRAINEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE YUDKIVSKA JOINED BY JUDGE SPIELMANN
CASE OF MÜRSEL EREN v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE POPOVIĆ
CASE OF DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MATSCHER

Document text Analytics

CASE OF ROBBA v. ITALY

Doc ref: 50293/99 • ECHR ID: 001-61339

Document date: October 9, 2003

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 4

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

0 unique documents citing • I citations total to n paragraphs

Outbound citations

6 unique documents cited • o citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846