Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SCHENKEL v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF TURKIYE IS BANKASI AGAINST FINLAND
CASE OF HORNSBY v. GREECEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VALTICOS
CASE OF POITRIMOL v. FRANCEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI
Commission Regulation (EC) No 24/2000 of 6 January 2000 fixing the maximum export refund on rye in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1758/1999
CASE OF STEPHENS v. MALTA (No. 1)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BRATZA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 372/2006 of 2 March 2006 fixing the representative prices and the additional import duties for molasses in the sugar sector applicable from 3 March 2006
CASE OF KAZANTSEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BAKANOVA v. LITHUANIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S SAJÓ, ZUPANČIČ AND WOJTYCZEK
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1359/2002 of 25 July 2002 fixing the export refunds on rice and broken rice and suspending the issue of export licences

Document text Analytics

CASE OF PANEK v. POLAND

Doc ref: 38663/97 • ECHR ID: 001-61563

Document date: January 8, 2004

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

W unique documents cited • B citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846