Browsing history:

↳
MPP GOLUB v. UKRAINE
CASE OF MORICE v. FRANCEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS
CASE OF SUTYAZHNIK v. RUSSIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S KOVLER AND STEINER
Commission Regulation (EC) No 14/2001 of 4 January 2001 fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2097/2000
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/17 of 7 January 2016 authorising the United Kingdom to prohibit on its territory the marketing of a variety of hemp listed in the Common Catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species, pursuant to Council Directive 2002/53/EC
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1113/2003 of 26 June 2003 amending Regulation (EC) No 2376/2002 opening and providing for the administration of a Community tariff quota for barley from third countries and derogating from Council Regulation (EC) No 1766/92
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3669/86 of 1 December 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 685/69 on detailed rules of application for intervention on the market in butter and cream
CASE OF PLA AND PUNCERNAU v. ANDORRADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GARLICKI
CASE OF PALAORO v. AUSTRIASEP ARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MARTENS

Document text Analytics

CASE OF VADALA v. ITALY

Doc ref: 51703/99 • ECHR ID: 001-61709

Document date: April 20, 2004

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

q unique documents citing • V citations total to S paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846