Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF STORK v. GERMANYJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BUTKEVYCH , TSATSA-NIKOLOVSKA AND B OTOUCHAROVA
CASES OF DELBEC III, D.M., L.R. AND LAIDIN AGAINST FRANCE
CASE OF PENIAS AND ORTMAIR v. AUSTRIAJOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES VAJIĆ AND LAFFRANQUE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2344/2003 of 30 December 2003 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1067/93 of 30 April 1993 fixing the export refunds on beef
CASE OF ANGIROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ENGEL v. HUNGARY
CASE OF UOTI v. FINLAND
Commission Regulation (EC) No 20/2003 of 6 January 2003 suspending the preferential customs duties and re-establishing the Common Customs Tariff duty on imports of small-flowered roses originating in Israel
CASE OF GOROSHCHENYA v. RUSSIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF SURMAN-JANUSZEWSKA v. POLAND

Doc ref: 52478/99 • ECHR ID: 001-61741

Document date: April 27, 2004

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 3

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

e unique documents cited • E citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846