Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MUHAMMAD AND MUHAMMAD v. ROMANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE ELÓSEGUI
CASE OF RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA (ARTICLE 50)
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MYJER
Commission Regulation (EU) No 169/2010 of 1 March 2010 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 881/89 of 5 April 1989 introducing a countervailing charge on artichokes originating in Egypt
CASE OF BEN KHEMAIS AND 3 OTHERS CASES AGAINST ITALY
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2792/86 of 22 July 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2855/85 as regards the implementing rules for the specimen declaration form for use in trade in goods within the Community
CASE OF PASCAL v. ROMANIA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1821/89 of 23 June 1989 determining the quantity of potatoes required for the manufacture of one tonne of starch, and the minimum price payable for that quantity
CASE OF CISZEWSKI v. POLAND

Search
document

Document text Analytics

CASE OF CISZEWSKI v. POLAND

Doc ref: 38668/97 • ECHR ID: 001-61898

Document date: July 13, 2004

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF CISZEWSKI v. POLAND

Doc ref: 38668/97 • ECHR ID: 001-61898

Document date: July 13, 2004

Cited paragraphs only

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846