Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SAINTE-MARIE v. FRANCEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WALSH
CASE OF PLOT v. FRANCE
LUPULET v. ROMANIA
CASE OF HADJIKOSTOVA v. BULGARIA
CASE OF VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDSPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MIFSUD BONNICI
CASE OF MAMIC v. SLOVENIA
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 634/2011 of 29 June 2011 opening a standing invitation to tender for the 2010/2011 marketing year for imports of sugar of CN code 1701 at a reduced customs duty
Commission Regulation (EC) No 537/1999 of 11 March 1999 fixing the maximum export refund on common wheat in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1079/98
CASE OF SIGURÐUR A. SIGURJÓNSSON v. ICELANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON
Commission Regulation (EC) No 25/2000 of 6 January 2000 fixing the maximum export refund on common wheat in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1707/1999

Document text Analytics

CASE OF WODITSCHKA AND WILFLING v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 69756/01;6306/02 • ECHR ID: 001-67150

Document date: October 21, 2004

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 5

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

H unique documents citing • z citations total to V paragraphs

Outbound citations

B unique documents cited • H citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846