Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF BENEDIK v. SLOVENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDG E YUDKIVSKA, JOINED BY JUDGE BO Å NJAK
CASE OF PALADI v. MOLDOVAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE Å IKUTA
CASE OF KOPP v. SWITZERLAND
2011/524/EU: Commission Decision of 23 March 2011 on the State aid C 28/05 (ex NN 18/05, ex N 517/2000) implemented by Germany for Glunz AG and OSB Deutschland GmbH (notified under document C(2011) 1764) Text with EEA relevance
CASE OF FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES LEMMENS AND ZÃœND
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products
CASE OF DARVAS AGAINST HUNGARY
CASE OF GÜZEL v. TURKEY (No. 1)
CASE OF ÖNERYILDIZ v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL, JOINED BY JUDGES TÃœRMEN AND MARUSTE
CASE OF AYDAN v. TURKEY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF DUBENKO v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 74221/01 • ECHR ID: 001-67915

Document date: January 11, 2005

Inbound citations: 34
•
Cited paragraphs: 13
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

mz unique documents citing • pI citations total to yH paragraphs

Outbound citations

q unique documents cited • Y citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846