Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF POSLU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF CIULLA v. ITALYJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT AND GÖLCÜKLÜ
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1820/2002 of 11 October 2002 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2958/93 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2019/93 as regards the specific arrangements for the supply of certain agricultural products
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 of 26 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of tariff quotas for imports of maize and sorghum into Spain and imports of maize into Portugal
CASE OF GARTUKAYEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF AMBRUSZKIEWICZ v. POLAND
CASE OF TOROPOV v. UKRAINE
CASE OF STEMPFER v. AUSTRIA
Commission Directive 79/640/EEC of 21 June 1979 amending the Annexes to Council Directive 77/576/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the provision of safety signs at places of work
CASE OF KIENAST v. AUSTRIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF CHIZHOV v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 6962/02 • ECHR ID: 001-69028

Document date: May 17, 2005

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 5

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

U unique documents citing • 5 citations total to e paragraphs

Outbound citations

R unique documents cited • L citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846